A typical claim is that Denmark’s transmission network is not built for nuclear power. According to
the opponents, it must first be rebuilt, which will be too expensive and challenging. However, this
argument has many logical fallacies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Interestingly, Denmark’s transmission network was not originally built to receive wind turbine power
but was upgraded for that purpose. With that argument, we should have refrained from developing
wind turbines in the 1980s and 1990s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Denmark’s entire electricity grid must nevertheless be changed, expanded, and extended in the
future; thus, the transmission grid must be upgraded due to wind and solar, which are produced far
from consumers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
A typical claim is that Denmark’s transmission network is not built for nuclear power. According tothe opponents, it must first be rebuilt, which will be too expensive and challenging. However, thisargument has many logical fallacies. Interestingly, Denmark’s transmission network was not originally built to receive wind turbine powerbut was upgraded for that purpose. With that …<\/p>\n